RIPEMD-160 is not as widely adopted outside blockchain applications as SHA-2 family functions. While it remains secure for its intended use, many modern systems prefer SHA-256 or SHA-3 due to broader standardization and NIST approval. Developers should choose hash functions based on industry requirements and compatibility.
The 160-bit output provides less collision resistance than 256-bit hashes. While still considered secure for current applications, future advances in quantum computing or cryptanalysis could necessitate migration to longer hashes. Organizations should monitor cryptographic research and plan for potential upgrades.
Browser-based Web Crypto API does not include RIPEMD-160, meaning this tool requires server-side processing or Node.js environments. For purely client-side applications, developers must use JavaScript libraries, which may introduce performance or security trade-offs compared to native implementations.
RIPEMD-160 is primarily used in legacy or specialized contexts. New projects should evaluate whether its use is necessary or if more common hash functions would suffice. Adopting widely supported algorithms simplifies integration, reduces maintenance, and ensures long-term compatibility.